<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Encourage Lorem Ipsum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gotchance.com/blog/2010/05/10/why-i-encourage-lorem-ipsum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gotchance.com/blog/2010/05/10/why-i-encourage-lorem-ipsum/</link>
	<description>web (design + development) and other geeky stuff !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:57:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hari</title>
		<link>http://gotchance.com/blog/2010/05/10/why-i-encourage-lorem-ipsum/comment-page-1/#comment-6566</link>
		<dc:creator>Hari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 15:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gotchance.com/blog/?p=591#comment-6566</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, Design Informer has a point too. Lorem Ipsum has distracted many client and causes other problems. Anyway, it is less of a problem than it has been projected as.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, Design Informer has a point too. Lorem Ipsum has distracted many client and causes other problems. Anyway, it is less of a problem than it has been projected as.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Name You Know</title>
		<link>http://gotchance.com/blog/2010/05/10/why-i-encourage-lorem-ipsum/comment-page-1/#comment-6565</link>
		<dc:creator>The Name You Know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 15:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gotchance.com/blog/?p=591#comment-6565</guid>
		<description>First of all I agree with you, in the sense that Lorem Ipsum is practically standard. Secondly I think that the arguments used by Design Informar are weak in comparison with the way in which Lorem Ipsum is presented as a problem. The Design Informar article is just hype to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all I agree with you, in the sense that Lorem Ipsum is practically standard. Secondly I think that the arguments used by Design Informar are weak in comparison with the way in which Lorem Ipsum is presented as a problem. The Design Informar article is just hype to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

